Home - Professionals - Yongxiang MA

Yongxiang MA

Lawyer
  • 010-64229007
  • mayongxiang@ruoshanlaw.com
  • Beijing

Download CV

Professional Profile

Lawyer Ma Yongxiang once worked at the Patent Examination Cooperation Center of the National Intellectual Property Administration. He engaged in the substantive examination and reexamination of invention patents for over ten years. He has excellent patent search and analysis capabilities. During his work, he was honored as an outstanding examiner, an expert examiner, an outstanding Party member, etc. on many occasions. Many of his cases were rated as excellent cases by the bureau or the center. He was among the first batch of personnel to obtain a Class A search rating from the bureau and was invited many times to provide search training for relevant enterprises or agencies.

Before joining Ruoshan, he worked at a well - known patent agency, specializing in patent invalidation and litigation for many years. He has handled many intellectual property litigation cases with significant domestic and international influence. For example, in the patent dispute case between Bull Group and Tongling Group, the litigation amount involved was as high as 1 billion yuan. As the lead lawyer, he was fully responsible for matters such as case search, writing of invalidation opinions, and oral hearings. Eventually, he successfully invalidated the opponent's patent and won the lawsuit.


Key Achievements

  • In the invalidation case of Bull Group's sockets, the litigation amount involved was as high as 1 billion yuan, involving two patents. As the lead lawyer for one of the patents, he was fully responsible for case search, writing of invalidation opinions, oral hearings, etc. Eventually, he successfully invalidated the opponent's patent and won the lawsuit.
  • In response to the invalidation case initiated by Rohm Co., Ltd. against Giantec Semiconductor in the United States, he represented Giantec Semiconductor in the invalidation defense and successfully maintained the patent right.
  • Nokia Corporation initiated a series of domestic and international infringement liti-gations against a well - known domestic communication enterprise. As the lead lawyer, he represented the domestic well - known communication enterprise in in-validating Nokia's standard - essential patents.
  • Entrusted by a domestic lithium - battery enterprise, he initiated invalidation against a series of basic lithium - battery patents of Mitsubishi Chemical and successfully in-validated them.
  • In response to the infringement claim filed by Hilti AG against a well - known domestic manufacturer, he represented the domestic manufacturer in initiating invalidation against Hilti AG's involved patent, and most of the involved patent was invalidated.
  • Entrusted by British Pultane Large Vessel IP Limited, he initiated an infringement lawsuit against a domestic manufacturer and won the lawsuit.
  • In the patent litigation involving a well - known domestic toy enterprise, he was re-sponsible for the invalidation of the involved patent. Eventually, he successfully in-validated the opponent's patent and won the lawsuit.
  • Entrusted by a large domestic textile enterprise, due to the fact that an important basic patent of a competitor affected the enterprise's development, he initiated invalidation against the patent, successfully invalidated the competitor's patent, and removed the development obstacle for the enterprise.
  • Represented a well - known foreign company in the invalidation case of the ap-pearance design of an simple airstrip for aircraft. He initiated patent invalidation for the involved patent, was responsible for case search, writing of invalidation opinions, oral hearings, etc. He searched a large amount of video materials and finally found available invalidation evidence, successfully invalidated the opponent's patent, and won the lawsuit.
  • Represented a well - known domestic manufacturer of a washing machine liquid - feeding device in the invalidation case. The client planned to adopt the relevant technology of the involved patent in a new product. To avoid potential subsequent infringement disputes, he initiated patent invalidation for the involved patent, was responsible for case search, writing of invalidation opinions, oral hearings, etc. He conducted in - depth analysis of the involved patent, supplemented evidence and opinions several times, and successfully invalidated the opponent's patent.
  • Represented a well - known domestic manufacturer of handling robots in initiating invalidation against a competitor's patent and invalidated the competitor's patent.

Publications

  • "Research on Keyword Search" and "Research on Classification Number Search" were published in "Examination Practice in the Electrical Field" in 2014.
  • "Discussion on Full - text Search" was published in "Search Exchange Meeting of the National Intellectual Property Administration" in 2012.

Licenses & Certifications

Education

Work Experience

Languages

Chinese, English